<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>metarand &#187; Hedge Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metarand.com/category/hedge-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metarand.com</link>
	<description>meta musings and digital curation on tech, innovation, gadgets, lifestyle and the media arena</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hedge Fund 2.0 &#8211; what&#8217;s the footprint of a next generation fund</title>
		<link>http://metarand.com/2007/09/22/hedge-fund-20-whats-the-footprint-of-a-next-generation-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://metarand.com/2007/09/22/hedge-fund-20-whats-the-footprint-of-a-next-generation-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>metarand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venture Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metarand.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Paul Kedrosky commented that &#8220;hedge funds are the new software companies&#8221;. It&#8217;s certainly no stretch when applied to funds like DE Shaw. They have computer scientists beavering away on new algorithms to drive their investment methods. They opened up a VC arm (operates out of Apple&#8217;s old offices in Cupertino). But is this enough? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://metarand.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/wall-street-on-flickr-photo-sharing.jpg" title="wall-street-on-flickr-photo-sharing.jpg"><img src="http://metarand.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/wall-street-on-flickr-photo-sharing.jpg" alt="wall-street-on-flickr-photo-sharing.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Paul Kedrosky <a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2007/09/15/moneytech_hedge.html">commented</a> that &#8220;hedge funds are the new software companies&#8221;. It&#8217;s certainly no stretch when applied to funds like DE Shaw. They have computer scientists beavering away on new algorithms to drive their investment methods. They opened up a VC arm (operates out of Apple&#8217;s old offices in Cupertino). But is this enough?</p>
<p>Should hedge funds expand their opportunism &#8211; the analogy is the Facebook &#8220;fund&#8221; that Accel is participating in. Would a hedge fund that allocates a small team and capital towards a Web 2.0 Platform &#8220;fund&#8221; clean up the space (given the alleged <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/21/google-to-out-open-facebook-on-november-5/">expansion</a> of Google into opening up its platform the space will grow exponentially).</p>
<p>Should hedge funds invest even more into tech development &#8211; for example would a hedge fund with order of magnitude better machine learning algorithms be able to steal a march on competitors?</p>
<p>[Picture of Wall Street courtesy of Stuck in Customs]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://metarand.com/2007/09/22/hedge-fund-20-whats-the-footprint-of-a-next-generation-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

