<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzz, Traffic and the Techmemeffect: Key Ways To Grow Your Blog Presence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metarand.com/2008/05/11/buzz-traffic-and-the-techmemeffect-key-ways-to-grow-your-blog-presence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metarand.com/2008/05/11/buzz-traffic-and-the-techmemeffect-key-ways-to-grow-your-blog-presence/</link>
	<description>meta musings and digital curation on tech, innovation, gadgets, lifestyle and the media arena</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elias Bizannes</title>
		<link>http://metarand.com/2008/05/11/buzz-traffic-and-the-techmemeffect-key-ways-to-grow-your-blog-presence/comment-page-1/#comment-20366</link>
		<dc:creator>Elias Bizannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metarand.com/?p=362#comment-20366</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s some other data if this helps. I&#039;m thinking of pulling it together because the data on the traffic genuinely is interesting. I just happened to write a good piece that people liked, and what drove the traffic surprised me.

I posted it at 1am on Christmas night (well boxing day), and woke up to dozens of comments in the moderation queue. I thought people would have switched off to celebrate Christmas but clearly not because over two days alone I received 4000+ unique visitors, of which about 40% were from Techmeme (Hackernews narrowly beat Techmeme). It dropped off later on, but it was picked up by other sources, which shows an indirect influence of Techmeme.

I was about half way down the page, but I stayed up there for about a day. http://www.techmeme.com/081225/h1850

I guess it&#039;s a particular audience. What though, I have no idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s some other data if this helps. I&#8217;m thinking of pulling it together because the data on the traffic genuinely is interesting. I just happened to write a good piece that people liked, and what drove the traffic surprised me.</p>
<p>I posted it at 1am on Christmas night (well boxing day), and woke up to dozens of comments in the moderation queue. I thought people would have switched off to celebrate Christmas but clearly not because over two days alone I received 4000+ unique visitors, of which about 40% were from Techmeme (Hackernews narrowly beat Techmeme). It dropped off later on, but it was picked up by other sources, which shows an indirect influence of Techmeme.</p>
<p>I was about half way down the page, but I stayed up there for about a day. <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/081225/h1850" rel="nofollow">http://www.techmeme.com/081225/h1850</a></p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s a particular audience. What though, I have no idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metarand</title>
		<link>http://metarand.com/2008/05/11/buzz-traffic-and-the-techmemeffect-key-ways-to-grow-your-blog-presence/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>metarand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metarand.com/?p=362#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this Lachlan. It seems your experience is at the opposite end of the spectrum to Ryans. 

I invite others to share their experiences and will certainly monitor this closely.

Yes, I did make an assumption about my audience and the focus of metarand is as you describe it - I could&#039;ve explicitly pointed this out, but decided not to let it be implied from the context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this Lachlan. It seems your experience is at the opposite end of the spectrum to Ryans. </p>
<p>I invite others to share their experiences and will certainly monitor this closely.</p>
<p>Yes, I did make an assumption about my audience and the focus of metarand is as you describe it &#8211; I could&#8217;ve explicitly pointed this out, but decided not to let it be implied from the context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lachlan Hardy</title>
		<link>http://metarand.com/2008/05/11/buzz-traffic-and-the-techmemeffect-key-ways-to-grow-your-blog-presence/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Lachlan Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metarand.com/?p=362#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>As I mentioned on Twitter, I saw no traffic spike from my (single) Techmeme linking. In fact, I received a grand total of 1 visitor from Techmeme.

It was for my &lt;a href=&quot;http://log.lachstock.com.au/past/2008/4/1/phishing-fools/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Phishing Fools&lt;/a&gt; about OAuth and phishing behaviour patterns. My post was the lead &#039;discussion&#039; article on Techmeme (as in the  first linked under the article &#039;defining&#039; that segment of Techmeme news).

This is isolated data, and I&#039;m sure it&#039;s not representative, but here&#039;s why I find it interesting. That article was also linked by Jeremy Keith on his blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://adactio.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Adactio&lt;/a&gt;, and by Marshall Kirkpatrick in a ReadWriteWeb article.

I got 1 visitor from Techmeme, 37 from RWW and 300-odd from Adactio.

That has to be about audience relevancy.


Ryan Spoon failed to point out the importance of what audience you want, and you&#039;ve done the same. You mention &#039;highly engaged and relevant readers&#039; in your post above. That&#039;s only true of Techmeme if your blog is focused on the meta-discussion around startups and Silicon Valley. Yours is, pretty much, so it probably works for you?

(although I note that this post is not listed under the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techmeme.com/080511/p14#a080511p14&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discussion for Ryan Spoon&#039;s post&lt;/a&gt; - no other posts there either)

Or do you just expect that anybody reading this would have the same objective for their blog as you do? Am I the lone exception in your readers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned on Twitter, I saw no traffic spike from my (single) Techmeme linking. In fact, I received a grand total of 1 visitor from Techmeme.</p>
<p>It was for my <a href="http://log.lachstock.com.au/past/2008/4/1/phishing-fools/" rel="nofollow">Phishing Fools</a> about OAuth and phishing behaviour patterns. My post was the lead &#8216;discussion&#8217; article on Techmeme (as in the  first linked under the article &#8216;defining&#8217; that segment of Techmeme news).</p>
<p>This is isolated data, and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s not representative, but here&#8217;s why I find it interesting. That article was also linked by Jeremy Keith on his blog, <a href="http://adactio.com/" rel="nofollow">Adactio</a>, and by Marshall Kirkpatrick in a ReadWriteWeb article.</p>
<p>I got 1 visitor from Techmeme, 37 from RWW and 300-odd from Adactio.</p>
<p>That has to be about audience relevancy.</p>
<p>Ryan Spoon failed to point out the importance of what audience you want, and you&#8217;ve done the same. You mention &#8216;highly engaged and relevant readers&#8217; in your post above. That&#8217;s only true of Techmeme if your blog is focused on the meta-discussion around startups and Silicon Valley. Yours is, pretty much, so it probably works for you?</p>
<p>(although I note that this post is not listed under the <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080511/p14#a080511p14" rel="nofollow">discussion for Ryan Spoon&#8217;s post</a> &#8211; no other posts there either)</p>
<p>Or do you just expect that anybody reading this would have the same objective for their blog as you do? Am I the lone exception in your readers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

